|
The COMPANY of PLAYERS
Reviews: Terra Nova
It is a thought-provoking piece that sets many challenges to director, designer and actors, and it's a great tribute to Graham Kilner and his team that most of the audience probably left the theatre completely unaware of the difficulties it poses in performance. The production looked superb, we saw an impressive display of ensemble acting, and it was at times very moving. Any negative comments I make must be seen within that context. The set design was excellent, and rightly relied for its effect on simplicity and the merest indication of the polar wilderness. I thought the director was wise to eschew the use of the historic slides used in the original professional production, which I doubt would have added anything and might well have proved a distraction. Everything worked extremely well and unfussily, from the pitching and striking of the tent to the placing of the Norwegian flag. It somehow contrived to make the CoPs stage look vast, an achievement indeed. The overall effect was much enhanced by a good use of lighting on the cyclorama, suggesting the aurora australis, and by excellent atmospheric sound.
We saw an utterly believable recreation of the intricate network of relationships between the explorers. This was a tightly knit group of men who supported one another but who were also strongly aware of each other's strengths and weaknesses. The class differences between Evans and the rest were nicely highlighted, as was the subtle barrier between them and Scott. Good ensemble acting, which is what this was, tends to conceal the excellence of individual performances. It's perhaps a bit unfair to single anyone out for special mention, but I was particularly impressed by Andy Howell as Oates, who came across as a more interesting character than the conventional heroic stereotype we were brought up on. The one weak element in their collective contribution was the admittedly very difficult scene in which Evans dies, when everyone displayed an awkward hesitancy in grabbing hold of him, even after he had dropped the knife. That was incidentally another example of an inadequate hand prop: he should have been brandishing the kind of knife you'd gut a seal with, not the rather inoffensive weapon he actually had. The death itself is in my opinion virtually unplayable as written, and I'd have been tempted to cheat and have him die obscured from view by the others crowding around him. The character of Amundsen is like the chorus in Greek tragedy: commentator and interpreter of the action, and central to the audience's understanding of all that is unsaid by the other characters. He's the master of ceremonies who drives everything forward, and the part calls for a versatile actor with real stage presence. Andy Kirtley rose powerfully to the challenge, with a most authentic Norwegian accent, and the right kind of half cynical attitude to the unfolding events. The only thing that didn't quite work in his performance - and this applies equally to Chris Janes as Scott - was their big dialogue at the beginning of the play. This is admittedly a difficult scene, one of the challenges I referred to at the start. It reminds me of those long arguments that Shaw was so fond of, and it's vital to the significance of the play. As with much in Shaw, it's an extremely artificial discourse, and the actors' aim must be to hide that fact without losing the power of the argument. They have to inject the semblance of naturalism by interspersing the dialogue with the hesitations, fumbles and half-interjections of natural speech, and by showing the thought forming in the character's mind before it is uttered. In short, they have to make the arguments their own. What we got was a discourse that was fluently and expressively spoken, but remained the memorised words of someone else.
As Kathleen, Loretta Freeman seemed at first to be experiencing some of the same difficulty with the rather artificial writing that Chris and Andy had with their opening scene, but she carried off the courtship scene very well. Her speech near the end, when she describes hearing of Scott's death, was beautifully done; simple, sincere, and moving. The last scene of all, in which the dying Scott is tormented by repeated phrases from the rest of the characters, didn't quite work, and I'm not sure exactly why. It could have been something wrong with the lighting: too dim on Scott, too bright on the others. Scott's positioning also didn't help. I think it might have worked better had the tormentors gradually withdrawn into shadow, with the lights steadily narrowing down onto Scott himself. Whatever the cause, we lost some of the impact of Scott's last words. To sum up, this was a cleverly designed and well-acted production - though not without flaws - of a most interesting play. Congratulations to all concerned, and thanks for a most enjoyable evening's theatre. John Davies has been involved in amateur theatre in various places for nearly forty years, mainly as an actor and director. He has just completed a three year term as Chairman of the Barn Theatre, Welwyn Garden City.
Home
|
Little Theatre
|
In Production
|
Season
|
Past Productions
|
Reviews
|
Performers
|
News
|